THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION WAS OBTAINED FROM THE PHYSICIAN REGISTER SECTION OF THE WEBSITE OF THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS OF ONTARIO (WWW.CPSO.ON.CA) AS OF THE DATE AND TIME NOTED BELOW
13/06/25 02:21:14 AM

General Information

Former Name: No Former Name
Medical School: University of Toronto, 1970
Gender: Man
Languages Spoken: ENGLISH

Practice Information

Primary Business Location: Address not Available
Business Email: No Information Available
Phone: No Information Available
Fax: No Information Available

Specialties

No Specialty Reported

Hospital Privileges

No information available

General Information

Former Name: No Former Name
Gender: Man
Languages Spoken: ENGLISH
Medical School: University of Toronto, 1970

Practice Information

Primary Business Location: Address not Available
Business Email: No Information Available
Phone: No Information Available
Fax: No Information Available

Specialties

No Specialty Reported

Hospital Privileges

No information available

Practice Conditions

This physician is inactive (Expired, Resigned, Suspended, Revoked, or Deceased) and is not permitted to practise medicine.
This physician is inactive (Expired, Resigned, Suspended, Revoked, or Deceased) and is not permitted to practise medicine.

Current Tribunal Proceedings

No information available

Past Tribunal Proceedings (1)

Date of Decision: 27 Sep 2018
Summary of Decision:
On September 27, 2018, the Discipline Committee found that Dr. William Andrew Roy committed an act of professional misconduct, in that he has engaged in conduct or an act or omission relevant to the practice of medicine that, having regard to all the circumstances, would reasonably be regarded by members as disgraceful, dishonourable or unprofessional.

Dr. Roy is a General Practitioner, practising in Toronto. He obtained his Independent Practice Certificate in 1971.

The College received information from the Narcotics Monitoring System (NMS) identifying Dr. Roy as having prescribed, in 2015, eight or more patients at least 650 oral morphine equivalents (OMEs) per day and issued at least one prescription exceeding 20,000 OMEs. This prescribing exceeds the recommended watchful dose of 200 OMEs per day as set out in The Canadian Guideline for Safe and Effective Use of Opioids for Chronic Non-Cancer Pain (v 5.6, April 30, 2010). In total, 19 patients were flagged by the NMS.

The College retained an expert, a family physician certified by the College of Family Physicians of Canada, to review this matter. The expert concluded that Dr. Roy failed to meet the standard of practice of the profession in 13 of the 20 charts reviewed and noted that:

- the main areas of concern are his prescriptions for very high doses of opioids, often in combination with high doses of benzodiazepines, poor record keeping with respect to opioid prescribing, and lack of monitoring of patients with prescriptions for high doses of opioids.
- Dr. Roy displayed a lack of knowledge in 2 charts as evident in situations where he indicated that he prescribed two different long-acting opioids as one did not appear to be effective, and where a patient was currently using intravenous street drugs, but he felt that the patient would still require prescription opioids for his pain.
- Dr. Roy displayed a lack of skill in 5 charts as evident by his management of patients who demonstrated inappropriate behaviour or features of misuse.
- Dr. Roy displayed a lack of judgment in 10 of the charts reviewed, which was evident in the management of patients who were prescribed high doses of opioids and benzodiazepines without adequate monitoring for safety and effectiveness.

The expert concluded that in 7 of the 20 charts reviewed, Dr. Roy exposed patients to a potential risk of harm due to the extremely high doses of opioids that were prescribed in combination with high doses of benzodiazepines and by not monitoring the patients closely enough to ensure that they were taking the medications safely.

Disgraceful Dishonourable or Unprofessional Conduct

As a resolution, Dr. Roy entered into an undertaking with the College in June of 2017, requiring, among other things, that Dr. Roy practise under the guidance of a clinical supervisor acceptable to the College. If unable to obtain a clinical supervisor, Dr. Roy is required to cease to prescribe narcotic drugs, narcotic preparations, controlled drugs, benzodiazepines and other targeted substances, and all other monitored drugs.

Dr. Roy obtained a clinical supervisor on July 19, 2017. However, on August 29, 2017, due to a potential conflict of interest, Dr. Roy was notified that this clinical supervisor was no longer suitable. Dr. Roy was provided with fourteen days to obtain a new clinical supervisor.

Dr. Roy did not propose a suitable supervisor within the time limit set out in the undertaking. He was reminded on September 12, 2017, that, in accordance with the terms of the undertaking, he would have to cease prescribing by the end of the day, unless a supervisor was proposed and approved. Following a request by Dr. Roy’s counsel, an extension was provided until September 15, 2017.

Dr. Roy was unable to find a suitable clinical supervisor by the extended deadline. In accordance with the terms of the undertaking, and the terms, conditions and limitations on his certificate of registration effective September 19, 2017, Dr. Roy was required to cease prescribing narcotic drugs, narcotic preparations, controlled drugs, benzodiazepines and other targeted substances, and all other monitored drugs until such time as he has obtained a clinical supervisor acceptable to the College. This restriction appeared on the public register.

On October 13, 2017, another clinical supervisor was approved. On October 18, 2017, the clinical supervisor wrote to the College, noting that Dr. Roy had stated in their initial meeting earlier that day that he had continued to prescribe controlled substances during the period of time when he did not have a supervisor.

College Compliance Case Managers selected 13 patient names from Dr. Roy's prescribing log and obtained copies of the prescriptions and physician's notes from the corresponding charts. NMS data was obtained with respect to the 13 patients, which demonstrates that Dr. Roy continued to prescribe monitored drugs between the period of September 19, 2017 and October 18, 2017.

Disposition

On September 27, 2018, the Discipline Committee ordered and directed that:

- the Registrar suspend Dr. Roy’s certificate of registration for a period of three (3) months, commencing October 15, 2018.
- Dr. Roy participate in and successfully complete one-on-one individualized educational instruction in ethics with an instructor approved by the College, and provide proof thereof to the College within six (6) months of the date of this Order.
- Dr. Roy appear before the panel to be reprimanded.
- Dr. Roy pay to the College its costs of this proceeding in the amount of $10,180 within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order.
Reasons for Decision: Download Full Decision (PDF)
Hearing Date(s): September 27, 2018

Other Notifications (5)

Source: Member
Effective Date: 22 Sep 2021
Summary:
Summary of the Undertaking given by Dr. William Andrew Roy to the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario, effective September 22, 2021:

Following the result of a reassessment of Dr. Roy’s general practice that raised concerns about Dr. Roy’s standard of practice:

Dr. Roy will practise under the guidance of a Clinical Supervisor acceptable to the College for three (3) months.

Dr. Roy will engage in professional education in record-keeping.

Dr. Roy’s practice will be reassessed by an assessor selected by the College within three (3) months of the end of the period of Clinical Supervision. 
 


Source: Inquiries, Complaints and Reports Committee
Effective Date: 11 Aug 2021
Summary:
Caution-in-Person:
               
A summary of a decision of the Inquiries, Complaints and Reports Committee in which the disposition includes a "caution-in-person" is required by the College by-laws to be posted on the register, along with a note if the decision has been appealed.  A “caution-in-person” disposition requires the physician to attend at the College and be verbally cautioned by a panel of the Committee.  The summary will be removed from the register if the decision is overturned on appeal or review. Note that this requirement only applies to decisions arising out of a complaint dated on or after January 1, 2015, or if there was no complaint, the first appointment of investigators dated on or after January 1, 2015.
 
See PDF for the summary of a decision made against this member in which the disposition includes a Caution-in-Person:


Source: Inquiries, Complaints and Reports Committee
Effective Date: 25 Jun 2021
Summary:
Caution-in-Person:
               
A summary of a decision of the Inquiries, Complaints and Reports Committee in which the disposition includes a "caution-in-person" is required by the College by-laws to be posted on the register, along with a note if the decision has been appealed.  A “caution-in-person” disposition requires the physician to attend at the College and be verbally cautioned by a panel of the Committee.  The summary will be removed from the register if the decision is overturned on appeal or review. Note that this requirement only applies to decisions arising out of a complaint dated on or after January 1, 2015, or if there was no complaint, the first appointment of investigators dated on or after January 1, 2015.
 
See PDF for the summary of a decision made against this member in which the disposition includes a Caution-in-Person:


Source: Member
Effective Date: 17 Sep 2018
Summary:
Summary of the Undertaking given by Dr. William Andrew Roy to the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario, effective September 17, 2018:

Dr. Roy has agreed not to issue new prescriptions or renew existing prescriptions for or administer any of the following substances:

(i) Narcotic Drugs (from the Narcotic Control Regulations made under the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act, S.C., 1996, c. 19);
(ii) Narcotic Preparations (from the Narcotic Control Regulations made under the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act, S.C., 1996, c. 19);
(iii) Controlled Drugs (from Part G of the Food and Drug Regulations under the Food and Drugs Act, S.C., 1985, c. F-27);
(iv) Benzodiazepines and Other Targeted Substances (from the Benzodiazepines and Other Targeted Substances Regulations made under the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act., S.C., 1996, c. 19);
(v) All other Monitored Drugs (as defined under the Narcotics Safety and Awareness Act, 2010, S.O. 2010, c. 22);
and as amended from time to time.

Dr. Roy must post a clearly visible sign in the waiting rooms and each examination and consulting room, in all Practice Locations, which states as follows:

IMPORTANT NOTICE
Dr. Roy has agreed not to prescribe or administer any of the following:

Narcotic Drugs
Narcotic Preparations
Controlled Drugs
Benzodiazepines and Other Targeted Substances
All other Monitored Drugs

Further information may be found on the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario website at www.cpso.on.ca 


Source: Inquiries, Complaints and Reports Committee
Effective Date: 05 Jul 2017
Summary:
Caution-in-Person:

A summary of a decision of the Inquiries, Complaints and Reports Committee in which the disposition includes a "caution-in-person" is required by the College by-laws to be posted on the register, along with a note if the decision has been appealed. A “caution-in-person” disposition requires the physician to attend at the College and be verbally cautioned by a panel of the Committee. The summary will be removed from the register if the decision is overturned on appeal or review. Note that this requirement only applies to decisions arising out of a complaint dated on or after January 1, 2015 or if there was no complaint, the first appointment of investigators dated on or after January 1, 2015.

See PDF for the summary of a decision made against this member in which the disposition includes a caution-in-person.

Current Tribunal Proceedings

No information available

Past Tribunal Proceedings (1)

Date of Decision: 27 Sep 2018
Summary of Decision:
On September 27, 2018, the Discipline Committee found that Dr. William Andrew Roy committed an act of professional misconduct, in that he has engaged in conduct or an act or omission relevant to the practice of medicine that, having regard to all the circumstances, would reasonably be regarded by members as disgraceful, dishonourable or unprofessional.

Dr. Roy is a General Practitioner, practising in Toronto. He obtained his Independent Practice Certificate in 1971.

The College received information from the Narcotics Monitoring System (NMS) identifying Dr. Roy as having prescribed, in 2015, eight or more patients at least 650 oral morphine equivalents (OMEs) per day and issued at least one prescription exceeding 20,000 OMEs. This prescribing exceeds the recommended watchful dose of 200 OMEs per day as set out in The Canadian Guideline for Safe and Effective Use of Opioids for Chronic Non-Cancer Pain (v 5.6, April 30, 2010). In total, 19 patients were flagged by the NMS.

The College retained an expert, a family physician certified by the College of Family Physicians of Canada, to review this matter. The expert concluded that Dr. Roy failed to meet the standard of practice of the profession in 13 of the 20 charts reviewed and noted that:

- the main areas of concern are his prescriptions for very high doses of opioids, often in combination with high doses of benzodiazepines, poor record keeping with respect to opioid prescribing, and lack of monitoring of patients with prescriptions for high doses of opioids.
- Dr. Roy displayed a lack of knowledge in 2 charts as evident in situations where he indicated that he prescribed two different long-acting opioids as one did not appear to be effective, and where a patient was currently using intravenous street drugs, but he felt that the patient would still require prescription opioids for his pain.
- Dr. Roy displayed a lack of skill in 5 charts as evident by his management of patients who demonstrated inappropriate behaviour or features of misuse.
- Dr. Roy displayed a lack of judgment in 10 of the charts reviewed, which was evident in the management of patients who were prescribed high doses of opioids and benzodiazepines without adequate monitoring for safety and effectiveness.

The expert concluded that in 7 of the 20 charts reviewed, Dr. Roy exposed patients to a potential risk of harm due to the extremely high doses of opioids that were prescribed in combination with high doses of benzodiazepines and by not monitoring the patients closely enough to ensure that they were taking the medications safely.

Disgraceful Dishonourable or Unprofessional Conduct

As a resolution, Dr. Roy entered into an undertaking with the College in June of 2017, requiring, among other things, that Dr. Roy practise under the guidance of a clinical supervisor acceptable to the College. If unable to obtain a clinical supervisor, Dr. Roy is required to cease to prescribe narcotic drugs, narcotic preparations, controlled drugs, benzodiazepines and other targeted substances, and all other monitored drugs.

Dr. Roy obtained a clinical supervisor on July 19, 2017. However, on August 29, 2017, due to a potential conflict of interest, Dr. Roy was notified that this clinical supervisor was no longer suitable. Dr. Roy was provided with fourteen days to obtain a new clinical supervisor.

Dr. Roy did not propose a suitable supervisor within the time limit set out in the undertaking. He was reminded on September 12, 2017, that, in accordance with the terms of the undertaking, he would have to cease prescribing by the end of the day, unless a supervisor was proposed and approved. Following a request by Dr. Roy’s counsel, an extension was provided until September 15, 2017.

Dr. Roy was unable to find a suitable clinical supervisor by the extended deadline. In accordance with the terms of the undertaking, and the terms, conditions and limitations on his certificate of registration effective September 19, 2017, Dr. Roy was required to cease prescribing narcotic drugs, narcotic preparations, controlled drugs, benzodiazepines and other targeted substances, and all other monitored drugs until such time as he has obtained a clinical supervisor acceptable to the College. This restriction appeared on the public register.

On October 13, 2017, another clinical supervisor was approved. On October 18, 2017, the clinical supervisor wrote to the College, noting that Dr. Roy had stated in their initial meeting earlier that day that he had continued to prescribe controlled substances during the period of time when he did not have a supervisor.

College Compliance Case Managers selected 13 patient names from Dr. Roy's prescribing log and obtained copies of the prescriptions and physician's notes from the corresponding charts. NMS data was obtained with respect to the 13 patients, which demonstrates that Dr. Roy continued to prescribe monitored drugs between the period of September 19, 2017 and October 18, 2017.

Disposition

On September 27, 2018, the Discipline Committee ordered and directed that:

- the Registrar suspend Dr. Roy’s certificate of registration for a period of three (3) months, commencing October 15, 2018.
- Dr. Roy participate in and successfully complete one-on-one individualized educational instruction in ethics with an instructor approved by the College, and provide proof thereof to the College within six (6) months of the date of this Order.
- Dr. Roy appear before the panel to be reprimanded.
- Dr. Roy pay to the College its costs of this proceeding in the amount of $10,180 within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order.
Reasons for Decision: Download Full Decision (PDF)
Hearing Date(s): September 27, 2018

Other Notifications (5)

Source: Member
Effective Date: 22 Sep 2021
Summary:
Summary of the Undertaking given by Dr. William Andrew Roy to the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario, effective September 22, 2021:

Following the result of a reassessment of Dr. Roy’s general practice that raised concerns about Dr. Roy’s standard of practice:

Dr. Roy will practise under the guidance of a Clinical Supervisor acceptable to the College for three (3) months.

Dr. Roy will engage in professional education in record-keeping.

Dr. Roy’s practice will be reassessed by an assessor selected by the College within three (3) months of the end of the period of Clinical Supervision. 
 


Source: Inquiries, Complaints and Reports Committee
Effective Date: 11 Aug 2021
Summary:
Caution-in-Person:
               
A summary of a decision of the Inquiries, Complaints and Reports Committee in which the disposition includes a "caution-in-person" is required by the College by-laws to be posted on the register, along with a note if the decision has been appealed.  A “caution-in-person” disposition requires the physician to attend at the College and be verbally cautioned by a panel of the Committee.  The summary will be removed from the register if the decision is overturned on appeal or review. Note that this requirement only applies to decisions arising out of a complaint dated on or after January 1, 2015, or if there was no complaint, the first appointment of investigators dated on or after January 1, 2015.
 
See PDF for the summary of a decision made against this member in which the disposition includes a Caution-in-Person:


Source: Inquiries, Complaints and Reports Committee
Effective Date: 25 Jun 2021
Summary:
Caution-in-Person:
               
A summary of a decision of the Inquiries, Complaints and Reports Committee in which the disposition includes a "caution-in-person" is required by the College by-laws to be posted on the register, along with a note if the decision has been appealed.  A “caution-in-person” disposition requires the physician to attend at the College and be verbally cautioned by a panel of the Committee.  The summary will be removed from the register if the decision is overturned on appeal or review. Note that this requirement only applies to decisions arising out of a complaint dated on or after January 1, 2015, or if there was no complaint, the first appointment of investigators dated on or after January 1, 2015.
 
See PDF for the summary of a decision made against this member in which the disposition includes a Caution-in-Person:


Source: Member
Effective Date: 17 Sep 2018
Summary:
Summary of the Undertaking given by Dr. William Andrew Roy to the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario, effective September 17, 2018:

Dr. Roy has agreed not to issue new prescriptions or renew existing prescriptions for or administer any of the following substances:

(i) Narcotic Drugs (from the Narcotic Control Regulations made under the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act, S.C., 1996, c. 19);
(ii) Narcotic Preparations (from the Narcotic Control Regulations made under the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act, S.C., 1996, c. 19);
(iii) Controlled Drugs (from Part G of the Food and Drug Regulations under the Food and Drugs Act, S.C., 1985, c. F-27);
(iv) Benzodiazepines and Other Targeted Substances (from the Benzodiazepines and Other Targeted Substances Regulations made under the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act., S.C., 1996, c. 19);
(v) All other Monitored Drugs (as defined under the Narcotics Safety and Awareness Act, 2010, S.O. 2010, c. 22);
and as amended from time to time.

Dr. Roy must post a clearly visible sign in the waiting rooms and each examination and consulting room, in all Practice Locations, which states as follows:

IMPORTANT NOTICE
Dr. Roy has agreed not to prescribe or administer any of the following:

Narcotic Drugs
Narcotic Preparations
Controlled Drugs
Benzodiazepines and Other Targeted Substances
All other Monitored Drugs

Further information may be found on the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario website at www.cpso.on.ca 


Source: Inquiries, Complaints and Reports Committee
Effective Date: 05 Jul 2017
Summary:
Caution-in-Person:

A summary of a decision of the Inquiries, Complaints and Reports Committee in which the disposition includes a "caution-in-person" is required by the College by-laws to be posted on the register, along with a note if the decision has been appealed. A “caution-in-person” disposition requires the physician to attend at the College and be verbally cautioned by a panel of the Committee. The summary will be removed from the register if the decision is overturned on appeal or review. Note that this requirement only applies to decisions arising out of a complaint dated on or after January 1, 2015 or if there was no complaint, the first appointment of investigators dated on or after January 1, 2015.

See PDF for the summary of a decision made against this member in which the disposition includes a caution-in-person.

Training

Medical School: University of Toronto, 1970

Registration History

DETAILS DATE
Expired: Resigned from membership. Effective: 26 May 2022
Terms and conditions amended by Member. Effective: 22 Sep 2021
Suspension of registration removed. Effective: 15 Jan 2019
Suspension of registration imposed: Discipline Committee Effective: 15 Oct 2018
Terms and conditions amended by Discipline Committee. Effective: 27 Sep 2018
Terms and conditions amended by Member. Effective: 17 Sep 2018
Terms and conditions amended by Member. Effective: 09 Mar 2018
Terms and conditions amended by Member. Effective: 03 Mar 2018
Terms and conditions amended by Member. Effective: 27 Oct 2017
Terms and conditions amended by Member. Effective: 19 Sep 2017
Transfer of class of registration to: Restricted Certificate Effective: 08 Jun 2017
Transfer of class of registration to: Independent Practice Certificate Effective: 30 Jun 1971
First certificate of registration issued: Postgraduate Education Certificate Effective: 01 Jul 1970
DETAILS: Expired: Resigned from membership.
Date: Effective: 26 May 2022

DETAILS: Terms and conditions amended by Member.
Date: Effective: 22 Sep 2021

DETAILS: Suspension of registration removed.
Date: Effective: 15 Jan 2019

DETAILS: Suspension of registration imposed: Discipline Committee
Date: Effective: 15 Oct 2018

DETAILS: Terms and conditions amended by Discipline Committee.
Date: Effective: 27 Sep 2018

DETAILS: Terms and conditions amended by Member.
Date: Effective: 17 Sep 2018

DETAILS: Terms and conditions amended by Member.
Date: Effective: 09 Mar 2018

DETAILS: Terms and conditions amended by Member.
Date: Effective: 03 Mar 2018

DETAILS: Terms and conditions amended by Member.
Date: Effective: 27 Oct 2017

DETAILS: Terms and conditions amended by Member.
Date: Effective: 19 Sep 2017

DETAILS: Transfer of class of registration to: Restricted Certificate
Date: Effective: 08 Jun 2017
DETAILS: Terms and conditions imposed on certificate by: Member
Date: Effective: 08 Jun 2017

DETAILS: Transfer of class of registration to: Independent Practice Certificate
Date: Effective: 30 Jun 1971

DETAILS: First certificate of registration issued: Postgraduate Education Certificate
Date: Effective: 01 Jul 1970